Problems for Technologies and Asylum Procedures

Increasingly, systems and methods are being used to streamline asylum procedures. These types of range from biometric matching applications that study iris operates and finger prints to websites for asile and asylum seekers to chatbots that support all of them register proper protection instances. These kinds of technologies are meant to make this easier only for states and agencies to process asylum applications, especially as numerous systems are slowed down by the COVID-19 pandemic and growing degrees of required shift.

Yet these digital equipment raise a number of human benefits concerns with regards to migrants and demand new governance frames to ensure justness. These include level of privacy problems, opaque decision-making, and the prospect of biases or machine errors that result in discriminatory positive aspects.

In addition , a central difficult task for these technologies is their particular relationship to frame enforcement and asylum developing. The early failures of CBP One—along when using the Trump administration’s broader push for restrictive regulations that restrict usage of asylum—indicate why these technologies may be subject to political pressures and should not always be viewed as inescapable.

Finally, these types of technologies can shape how refugees are perceived and remedied, resulting in a great expanding carcerality that goes other than detention conveniences. For example , presentation and vernacular recognition tools create a specific educational space around migrants simply by requiring them to speak within a certain way. In turn, this configures all their subjecthood and can impact the decisions of decision-makers exactly who over-rely on reports generated by these tools. These procedures reinforce and amplify the power imbalances that exist between refugees and decision-makers.

Diese Seite verwendet Cookies, um die Nutzerfreundlichkeit zu verbessern. Mit der weiteren Verwendung stimmst du dem zu.